ReviewImmunological reviews2026
Modeling TCR-Epitope Recognition Specificity: What We Should Learn to Succeed.
Review in Immunological reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
T-cell recognition of infected or malignant cells is central to both spontaneous and therapy-induced cellular immune responses against pathogens and cancer. This recognition is elicited by the interaction between T-Cell Receptors (TCRs) and epitopes, which consist of antigenic peptides displayed on major histocompatibility complex molecules. TCR-epitope interactions are characterized by high diversity in TCR and epitope sequences and high structural flexibility in TCR loops. As a result, deciphering the rules of TCR-epitope recognition specificity and accurately predicting these interactions remains challenging. Here, we review the different strategies developed to predict TCR-epitope recognition, classify the principal computational frameworks, examine the data modalities on which they depend and discuss their current limitations. We then synthesize key conceptual insights that have emerged from recent research and outline how these lessons should inform the design of future experiments and next-generation computational tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.