ReviewAdvanced biomedical research2026
Standard Methods for Quality Control in Cell-Based Medicinal Products and their Validation for Clinical Applications.
Review in Advanced biomedical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, cell-based medicinal products (CMPs) have emerged as novel therapeutics with specific potential to treat a wide range of diseases. These products should be produced in accordance with good manufacturing practices (GMPs) and follow specific guidelines to ensure their safety and meet standard quality control criteria. This manuscript reviews current standard methods for quality control and validation specific to CMPs intended for clinical applications. We summarize critical quality attributes, including safety assessments such as sterility, endotoxin, mycoplasma, viral testing, tumorigenicity, and genetic stability; quantitative parameters, including cell counts and dose determination; and quality characteristics encompassing cell viability, morphology, growth kinetics, and immunophenotyping. We also address purity evaluation, potency assays, and the importance of validating analytical methods to guarantee reproducible and reliable test results. Furthermore, this article discusses necessary considerations for donor screening, raw material sourcing, manufacturing environment monitoring, and stability testing to maintain product integrity throughout production and storage. Emphasis is placed on adherence to GMP and relevant regulatory guidelines as defined by international pharmacopeias and authorities, such as the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. Finally, we highlight challenges faced in standardizing quality control for CMPs and underscore the need for continued development of rapid and robust testing methods tailored to their unique characteristics. This comprehensive overview aims to support academic and industrial stakeholders in implementing effective quality control strategies for advanced cell-based therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.