Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42427491›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

Artificial intelligence advancements in monoclonal antibody development technology.

Manar Ammar, Mikhail Samsonov, Evgeniya Gurylina, Daniel Bayzigitov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manar AmmarR&D, Laboratory for Development Biotechnological Processes, R-Pharm JSC, Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail SamsonovMedical Department, R-Pharm JSC, Moscow, Russia.
Evgeniya GurylinaMedical Department, R-Pharm JSC, Moscow, Russia.
Daniel BayzigitovBioPharmaceuticals R&D, R-Pharm JSC, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibody-based therapeutics have become essential tools for treating infectious, autoimmune, and malignant diseases due to their high specificity and efficacy. As their clinical and scientific relevance continues to expand, the need for faster, more accurate and cost-effective development strategies has grown. Traditional laboratory-based methods for antibody design and improving remain reliable but are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and limited by experimental constraints. These challenges have driven a shift toward the integration of computational methods as a complementary approach for antibody engineering. The current review provides a simplified overall explanation of recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI)-driven in silico tools used to accelerate and enhance the process of antibody discovery and optimization. We have systematically analyzed literature from clinical and research databases and summarized obtained data into a comprehensible overview. We highlighted how AI models contribute to sequence design, epitope-paratope predictions, affinity optimization, structural prediction and developability assessment. In conclusion, the most effective strategy for next-generation monoclonal antibody development relies on the integration of computational prediction and design tools followed by experimental validation. Combining AI-driven innovation with traditional laboratory methods represents a powerful and complementary approach for achieving accurate, efficient, and clinically relevant antibody therapeutics.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalArtificial IntelligenceAnimalsEpitopesHumansProtein EngineeringAntibodies, MonoclonalEpitopesartificial intelligencebiotechnologycomplementary determining regions (CDRs)deep learningmachine learningneural network

Identifiers

PMID42427491
PMCPMC13347191

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.