ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Context-Aware Evidence-Gated Plasticity for Multi-Goal Learning in Spiking Neural Networks.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background / Introduction: Biologically inspired spiking neural networks can model adaptive behavior, but learning multiple goals is difficult because synaptic updates for different targets can interfere. We tested whether multi-timescale plasticity and context-specific credit assignment could improve continual multi-goal learning in a spiking navigation system inspired by entorhinal-hippocampal circuitry. Methods: We developed a closed-loop spiking model containing grid-like, place-like, target-related, association, and motor-output populations. An agent navigated in a two-dimensional environment with randomized starting locations and learned through reward-modulated spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP/RL) and a novel evidence-gated plasticity (EGP) framework. EGP accumulates candidate synaptic modifications, evaluates them using reward evidence, and consolidates only changes that improve performance. A target-context variant maintained separate proposal stores and reward evaluation for each target. Results: STDP/RL learned and retained a single-target navigation policy, but multi-target training produced substantial interference, including attraction to incorrect targets after learning. Across 10 connectivity seeds, target-context EGP achieved higher late-stage reward than global EGP, improved weakest-target performance, and increased the fraction of targets achieving positive reward. In a longer continual-learning simulation, reward increased for all targets, TEST-phase performance increasingly exceeded TRAIN-phase performance, and proposal magnitudes grew over learning. Dwell-time confusion analyses showed that target-context EGP reduced wrong-target attraction and improved target selectivity relative to multi-target STDP/RL. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that spiking navigation circuits can learn goal-directed behavior using local plasticity, but robust multi-goal learning benefits from context-specific evidence-based consolidation. Target-context EGP provides a biologically motivated mechanism for reducing interference during continual reinforcement learning in spiking neural networks.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.