ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Revisiting the auditory hemodynamic response function in the era of fast fMRI.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in fast fMRI now enable whole-brain imaging with a TR of ≤1 s, which has helped to rekindle interest in characterizing the blood oxygen level dependent hemodynamic response function (BOLD HRF). Recent studies in the visual system have found intra-areal differences in temporal response characteristics, as well as HRFs that were faster and narrower than predicted by standard models. The auditory system presents a unique challenge, in that neuronal populations must operate across timescales of microseconds to minutes, and the surface of auditory cortex in particular is intricately and heavily vascularized. Here, we used fast fMRI to characterise voxelwise auditory HRFs evoked by short naturalistic sounds, assessing HRF reproducibility and variability across sessions, participants, and independent datasets. Across two studies at 3 T, participants passively listened to short environmental sounds while fMRI and quantitative MRI data were acquired with a 1s TR. Voxelwise HRFs were estimated via novel cross-session alignment routine, and exclusion of large vascular contributions. We identified a diverse set of hemodynamically plausible response shapes, which were not consistently captured by standard HRF approaches. These responses were reproducible within participants across sessions and robust across two independent acquisitions. Using data-driven gamma models, we achieved stable estimates with relatively few runs, particularly in auditory temporal regions. Within auditory cortex, we observed reproducible spatial gradients in response timing and shape, with faster and higher magnitude responses in medial regions, and slower and lower magnitude responses laterally. Together, these findings demonstrate that auditory HRFs are diverse, reliable, and regionally specific, and highlight the value of fast fMRI and data-driven modelling for advancing interpretation of fMRI data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.