ArticleAfrican journal of disability2026
The barriers to access healthcare services by people with disabilities: Policymakers' perspectives.
Article in African journal of disability, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accessibility to healthcare is a fundamental human right aimed at facilitating better health outcomes for people with disabilities. However, the persistent gap between policy intents and actual implementation results in poorer health outcomes for people with disabilities, which is against universal health coverage. Objectives: This study explored policymakers' perspectives on barriers to accessibility to healthcare services for people with disabilities. Method: Through purposive sampling, qualitative, descriptive, exploratory research was conducted among five policymakers in a rural constituency. Each participant signed an informed consent form. The face-to-face interview lasted 50-60 min and used validated semi-structured questions, audio recordings, and memos to capture data. Manual coding, employing an inductive approach and categorisation, was conducted, resulting in the formulation of themes. Results: Two main themes emerged: Systemic and structural challenges to inclusive healthcare, and training and attitudinal barriers to inclusive healthcare, highlighting transport and infrastructure barriers, as well as insufficient budget because of ineffective health policy implementation. A lack of training and discrimination were key issues reported. Conclusion: This study highlighted key obstacles related to weak policy enforcement, inadequate infrastructure, stigma, and funding issues, which impede accessibility to health services for people with disabilities in Namibia. Contribution: Understanding how policies are translated into practice is crucial for closing implementation gaps and enhancing healthcare access for people with disabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.