In one paragraphArticle in IMA fungus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
17 authors.
Veera Tuovinen NogeriusDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California Berkeley United States of America https://ror.org/01an7q238.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8558-3289 Marisol Sánchez-GarcíaDepartment of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University West Lafayette United States of America https://ror.org/02dqehb95.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-6281 Kerri KlutingDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California Berkeley United States of America https://ror.org/01an7q238.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2328-8081 Jussi HeinonsaloDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00790 Helsinki, Finland U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley United States of America https://ror.org/02jbv0t02.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8516-1388 Martin RybergDepartment of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden https://ror.org/02yy8x990.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6795-4349 Merje ToomeDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, US Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland https://ror.org/040af2s02.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9177-7218 Sajeet HaridasU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden https://ror.org/048a87296.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0229-0975 Stephen MondoU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden https://ror.org/048a87296.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5797-0647 Kurt LaButtiU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden https://ror.org/048a87296.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5838-1972 Matt NolanU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden https://ror.org/048a87296.
Anna LipzenU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden https://ror.org/048a87296.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2293-9329 Maxim KoriabineU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden https://ror.org/048a87296.
Diane BauerU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden https://ror.org/048a87296.
Kerrie BarryU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden https://ror.org/048a87296.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8999-6785 Igor V GrigorievU.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden https://ror.org/048a87296.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3136-8903 M Catherine AimeDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, US Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland https://ror.org/040af2s02.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8742-6685 Anna RoslingDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California Berkeley United States of America https://ror.org/01an7q238.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7003-5941 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Only a small fraction of the global fungal diversity is described, and a large number of fungal sequences from environmental DNA (eDNA) lack relevant reference sequences for taxonomic identification in metabarcoding studies. Among these are several deeply divergent fungal lineages, hypothesized to be class- and order-level lineages, currently known only by eDNA sequences. Here, we formally describe the first representative of one such lineage, previously referred to as Clade GS25, now captured in culture. We use a phylogenomic approach to test the phylogenetic placement and taxonomic rank hypothesized for this lineage and present the formally described
Indexed as
eDNAfungal culturefungigenomicsmetabarcodingnew species
Identifiers
PMID42427918
PMCPMC13347111
What Socratic holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390