ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Prognostic value of plasma brain-derived pTau.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Plasma brain-derived pTau217 (BD-pTau217) may provide a Alzheimer's disease-specific plasma tau measure than total pTau217, but its prognostic value is unclear. We compared BD-pTau217 and total plasma pTau217 for predicting clinical and amyloid PET progression in cognitively unimpaired (CU) ADNI participants. Methods: Plasma NULISAseq biomarkers were measured in 1,427 ADNI participants, including 529 CU individuals. Amyloid PET progression was assessed in baseline CU amyloid-negative participants (Centiloid ≥24.1) with longitudinal PET imaging; clinical progression was assessed in all baseline CU participants. Associations were evaluated using Cox models and time-dependent AUC. Results: BD-pTau217 did not clearly outperform total pTau217 for predicting progression to mild cognitive impairment or dementia. However, among baseline amyloid-negative participants (N=175), BD-pTau217 better predicted amyloid PET positivity at 2.5 years (tdAUC 0.82 vs 0.69; HR=10.54, p=0.00015) and 4 years (tdAUC 0.77 vs 0.64; HR=7.03, p=0.00055). Conclusion: BD-pTau217 improved prediction of near-term amyloid PET progression, with less clear advantage for clinical progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.