Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428135›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Stakeholder Perspectives on Long-Acting Injectable PrEP and MOUD: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.

Luzan JadKarim, Hannah Camp, Aurielle Thomas, Thomas Blue, Michael Gordon, Curt G Beckwith, Melissa J Zielinski, Jennifer L Vincenzo, Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luzan JadKarimDuke School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-1791-5413
Hannah CampDuke School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC.
Aurielle ThomasThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University/The Miriam Hospital, Division of Infectious Diseases, Providence, RI.
Thomas BlueFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD.
Michael GordonFriends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD.
Curt G BeckwithThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University/The Miriam Hospital, Division of Infectious Diseases, Providence, RI.
Melissa J ZielinskiThe University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Psychiatry, Little Rock, AR.
Jennifer L VincenzoThe University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Psychiatry, Little Rock, AR.ORCID 0000-0003-2026-8680
Lauren Brinkley-RubinsteinDuke School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC.

Funding

NOTRE: optimizing long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis and medications for opioid use disorder interventions in carceral settingsR61DA060583 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BECKWITH, CURT G, BRINKLEY-RUBINSTEIN, LAUREN · 2024 to 2024
$1.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R61 DA060583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-acting injectable (LAI) formulations of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) offer promising new approaches for addressing the intersecting challenges of HIV and opioid use disorder (OUD) in carceral settings. However, successful implementation requires understanding the perspectives of key carceral and community stakeholders. This qualitative study involved 17 semi-structured stakeholder interviews including correctional staff (medical and administrative) and community healthcare providers. Participants were recruited from jails in Washington, DC and surrounding Maryland counties. Interviews were coded using a mixed inductive and deductive methodology, and data were analyzed to identify key themes. Four overarching themes relevant to implementation emerged: (1) The presence of resource barriers, including jail staffing shortages and financial constraints; (2) Challenges administering medications including stigma, medical mistrust, and limited patient knowledge of medications; (3) challenging and restrictive carceral infrastructure; and (4) the importance of care continuity during carceral-to-community transition. Stakeholders emphasized that while LAI PrEP and MOUD could provide critical support to justice-involved individuals, systemic barriers challenged successful implementation and delivery in jail and during community re-entry. Our findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to address the resource, medication, and infrastructure challenges identified. Ensuring sustainable funding, providing staff training and education, improving patient education, addressing stigma, and strengthening community linkages are essential for the successful implementation of LAI PrEP and MOUD in carceral settings. These insights can inform future policies and practices aimed at improving health outcomes for justice-involved populations.

Indexed as

HIV preventionJail IncarcerationLong-acting injectable medicationsMOUDopioid use disorderPrEP

Identifiers

PMID42428135
PMCPMC13345426

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.