ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2026
Advances in understanding intestinal microbiota mechanisms and intervention strategies for anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, and constipation.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep disorders, and chronic constipation frequently co-occur and collectively impose a substantial clinical burden. Although these conditions may involve partially overlapping neural, endocrine, immune, and metabolic processes, their shared pathophysiological basis has not been fully established. This narrative review examines the potential role of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in linking affective symptoms, sleep disturbances, and chronic constipation. Evidence from human observational studies, Mendelian randomization analyses, animal models, and preliminary interventional studies suggests that alterations in gut microbial composition and function may contribute to these clinical associations through microbial metabolites, immune signaling, neuroendocrine regulation, and neural pathways. The review also summarizes microbiota-targeted interventions, including probiotics, prebiotics, dietary modification, and fecal microbiota transplantation. However, substantial heterogeneity in study populations, microbial findings, experimental methods, and intervention protocols limits causal interpretation and clinical generalization. A more rigorous distinction among associative, mechanistic, genetic, and interventional evidence is therefore required when evaluating the therapeutic potential of microbiota-based strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.