Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428331›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2026

Laparoscopic

Yi Ping Sng, YoungRok Choi, Su Young Hong, Hyo-Cheol Kim, Jin Woo Choi, Gayoung Kim, Min Kyoung Kim, Sang Hyuk Park, Jiyoung Kim, Jae-Yoon Kim and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yi Ping SngDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7863-0828
YoungRok ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2408-7086
Su Young HongDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9934-0456
Hyo-Cheol KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6016-247X
Jin Woo ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6639-8002
Gayoung KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7691-6854
Min Kyoung KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1988-3738
Sang Hyuk ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5171-4896
Jiyoung KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7464-8836
Jae-Yoon KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2546-3752
Jeong-Moo LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7806-8759
Suk Kyun HongDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0020-6215
Kwang-Woong LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6412-1926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study was performed to compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes between laparoscopic and open liver resection following transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). TARE is increasingly used as a bridge therapy for HCC when immediate resection is not feasible. However, the safety and efficacy of subsequent laparoscopic liver resection compared to open surgery remain unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 65 patients who underwent liver resection after TARE for HCC between 2012 and 2023 at a single high-volume center. Propensity score matching based on age, sex, tumor size, and tumor markers (AFP, PIVKA-II) yielded 18 matched pairs for laparoscopic and open surgery. Results: The laparoscopic group demonstrated shorter time from TARE to operation (99.7 days Conclusion: Laparoscopic liver resection following TARE appears to be a safe and effective approach for selected HCC patients, offering comparable oncologic outcomes to open surgery while achieving shorter hospitalization. These findings support the consideration of minimally invasive approaches in appropriate candidates after TARE at experienced centers.

Indexed as

Hepatocellular carcinomaLaparoscopyMinimally invasive surgical proceduresTransarterial radioembolizationYttrium radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID42428331
PMCPMC13347098

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.