ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
Regenerative Endodontic Procedure (REP) of a Previously Treated, Infected, Immature Permanent Incisor.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of immature permanent teeth with pulpal necrosis and prior endodontic failure remains clinically challenging due to incomplete root development, persistent infection, and reduced structural integrity. Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) offer a biologically driven alternative to apexification; however, their use in retreatment scenarios is not well documented. This report describes the successful treatment of a previously treated immature maxillary central incisor in a 7-year-old patient presenting with a chronic apical abscess and a longstanding sinus tract. Prior endodontic therapy was inadequate, with insufficient obturation and a poorly adapted full-coverage restoration contributing to coronal leakage and reinfection. Management involved removal of the existing root filling material, limited mechanical instrumentation, chemical disinfection with low-concentration sodium hypochlorite, placement of a triple-antibiotic paste, and subsequent induction of intracanal bleeding. Mineral trioxide aggregate was placed over the resulting scaffold, followed by definitive coronal restoration. Clinical and radiographic evaluations at 3, 12, and 34 months demonstrated complete resolution of apical pathology, absence of clinical symptoms, increased dentinal wall thickness, and continued root maturation with apical closure. This case supports the potential application of regenerative endodontic therapy in previously treated immature teeth with persistent infection. Establishing conditions favorable to biologic healing may allow preservation of regenerative capacity even in retreatment contexts. Further investigation is needed to clarify indications, predictability, and long-term outcomes of REPs in similar cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.