ArticleDystonia (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025
Brain network pathophysiology in dystonia.
Article in Dystonia (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dystonia is increasingly recognized as a disorder of brain networks. This review integrates multimodal evidence from human studies to characterize the network-level pathophysiology of dystonia. Structural MRI studies using voxel-based morphometry and diffusion imaging reveal alterations in gray matter volume and white matter connectivity across the sensorimotor cortex, basal ganglia, cerebellum, and thalamus. Functional imaging modalities, including PET, fMRI, EEG, MEG, and fNIRS, demonstrate aberrant activity and connectivity in cortico-striato-pallido-thalamocortical and cerebello-thalamocortical loops. Invasive electrophysiological recordings from deep brain stimulation (DBS) provide high-resolution insights into abnormal oscillatory activity and effective connectivity within these circuits. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques such as TMS, TES, and TUS provide a means of actively interrogating those networks through transient perturbation. They also provide an avenue for personalized neuromodulation. Computational models, including The Virtual Brain platform, enable integration of multimodal data to simulate dynamic network behavior. Across focal, generalized, and genetic forms of dystonia, shared patterns of network dysfunction are observed, though phenotypic and genotypic subtypes exhibit distinct topographies and circuit-level alterations. These findings underscore the importance of network dysfunction underlying dystonia. This network perspective informs the development of more targeted and individualized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, including circuit-guided neuromodulation and closed-loop brain stimulation. Advancing multimodal and integrative methodologies will be essential to unraveling the complex dynamics underlying dystonia and translating mechanistic insights into precision interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.