ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Association between vitamin D deficiency and incident varicose veins: a propensity score-matched cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence linking vitamin D deficiency (VDD) to varicose veins remains limited and largely derived from small or cross-sectional studies. We examined whether VDD is associated with incident varicose veins in a large real-world cohort. Methods: Using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, we conducted a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study of adults aged ≥40 years with at least two serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] measurements between 2010 and 2023. VDD was defined as two measurements ≤19.9 ng/mL, and controls had two measurements ≥30.0 ng/mL. A 1-year landmark design was applied. The primary outcome was 5-year incident varicose veins of the lower extremities. Secondary outcomes included varicose veins with ulceration, inflammation, and other complications. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: After matching, 257,651 patients were included in each cohort. VDD was associated with a higher risk of incident varicose veins (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.50-1.75; Conclusion: VDD was associated with an increased risk of incident varicose veins in this large cohort. This association was also observed among older adults and individuals with diabetes, suggesting potential effect modification by age and diabetic status. These findings suggest that reduced vitamin D status may be relevant to venous disease risk, although causality cannot be inferred. Further prospective studies are needed to determine whether correction of VDD can modify this risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.