ArticleCirculation reports2026
Expanded Application of the DOAC Score for Predicting Bleeding Events in All Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: An Integrated Analysis of 2 Prospective Japanese Registries-RAFFINE and SAKURA-AF.
Article in Circulation reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bleeding risk is a concern in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on oral anticoagulants (OACs). The DOAC score, a novel bleeding risk score, was developed for patients on direct OACs (DOACs), but its applicability to all anticoagulated patients remains unclear. The aim of this study was to validate the DOAC score in patients with AF who received any OACs. Methods and Results: We analyzed data for 6,505 patients with nonvalvular AF receiving OACs from 2 Japanese multicenter registries (RAFFINE, SAKURA-AF; mean age 72±9 years; 28.1% female). Major bleeding occurred in 76 patients within 1 year. The DOAC score was compared to the HAS-BLED score in discrimination ability. The DOAC score showed higher area under the curve (AUC), although the difference was not statistically significant (AUC 0.653 vs. 0.601, P=0.23). The DOAC score also showed a trend towards improved net reclassification over the HAS-BLED score (net reclassification improvement (NRI): 25.4%, P=0.073). In patients without a prior history of major bleeding, the DOAC score offered a significant improvement in the NRI (30.9%, P=0.030). Conclusions: The DOAC score demonstrated moderate performance for predicting major bleeding in anticoagulated patients with AF. Although it did not significantly outperform the HAS-BLED score in this study, its applicability to both DOAC and warfarin users may offer a practical, unified approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.