Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42428952›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2026

Clients' perceptions of nursing care services at selected public health facilities in Namibia: A qualitative study.

Nestor Tomas, Gisela H van Rensburg, Mokgadi Matlakala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nestor TomasDepartment of Health Studies, College of Human Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4769-2724
Gisela H van RensburgDepartment of Health Studies, College of Human Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0108-9943
Mokgadi MatlakalaDepartment of Health Studies, College of Human Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0980-7447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Satisfaction is a subjective phenomenon that is influenced by various contextual factors. In the healthcare sector, establishing a therapeutic relationship with patients is essential for facilitating active, mutual engagement and fostering collaboration. However, patient satisfaction with nursing care services in Namibia remains under-researched. Aim: The study explored and described clients' perceptions of nursing care services at selected public health facilities in Namibia. Setting: The study was conducted at two public health facilities in Namibia. Methods: An exploratory, descriptive qualitative design was utilised to recruit 13 clients for individual interviews through purposive sampling. Data were collected in 2022 using an interview guide and analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis. Results: Two key themes emerged: (1) nurse-client communication dynamics, encompassing clients' views on client satisfaction, and (2) innovative client suggestions for enhancing client satisfaction, detailing measures to address identified challenges. Conclusion: The study's findings underscore the need to implement targeted training initiatives for nurses and to adopt client-centred care models. Future research should explore client satisfaction through larger cross-sectional or longitudinal studies to inform strategies to enhance client satisfaction with nursing care. Contribution: The study provides valuable insights into client satisfaction and has implications for nursing practice in Namibia.

Indexed as

client satisfactionNamibianursing care servicespublic health facilitiesquality of healthcare

Identifiers

PMID42428952
PMCPMC13348411

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.