Evidence mapPaperPMID 42429068Full record

ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Dynamic Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Gynecological Surgery Using Perioperative Biomarkers and an Extremely Randomized Trees Model: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Yingsha Yao, Huizhen Lin, Chuhan Wang, Danli Ma, Yanhong Fu, Ting Wang, Huimin Yu, Ruoan Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yingsha YaoDepartment of Gynecology, Wenzhou Medical University, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Huizhen LinDepartment of Gynecology, Wenzhou Medical University, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Chuhan WangDepartment of Gynecology, Wenzhou Medical University, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Danli MaDepartment of Gynecology, Wenzhou Medical University, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Yanhong FuDepartment of Gynecology, Wenzhou Medical University, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Ting WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Huimin YuDepartment of Gynecology, Wenzhou Medical University, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Ruoan JiangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8006-3217

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundHospital-associated venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) is the leading preventable cause of death among patients undergoing gynecological surgery. Standard risk assessment methodologies, such as the Caprini score, which is a commonly utilized tool for risk assessment, do not sufficiently account for the unique vulnerabilities inherent to this specialty. To address these deficiencies, we aimed to develop a preliminary machine learning framework for predicting venous thromboembolism (VTE) in gynecological contexts.MethodsIn this retrospective case-control investigation, we identified 75 patients who were consecutively diagnosed with postoperative VTE after undergoing gynecological surgery at Ningbo NO.2 Hospital between March 2020 and February 2025. Controls were chosen using a matching protocol at a ratio of 1:3, resulting in the random selection of 225 patients free from VTE within the same surgical cohort during the same period. An Extremely Randomized Trees (Extratrees) machine learning classifier was constructed, incorporating 22 clinically relevant predictors identified by univariate analyses. We utilized the new model to compare it against the Caprini score.ResultsThe model was trained and validated with a class-stratified 70:30 split and exhibited remarkable discriminative ability, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.907 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.833-0.972], significantly exceeding the performance of the Caprini score (AUC 0.731, 95% CI: 0.660-0.803). The model showed consistent discrimination across validation groups, yielding an accuracy of 0.833.ConclusionThis preliminary machine learning framework, tailored specifically for gynecology, provides enhanced risk stratification for VTE.

Indexed as

BiomarkersGynecologic Surgical ProceduresVenous ThromboembolismCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMachine LearningMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentBiomarkersextratrees prediction modelgynecological surgerymachine learningprecision preventionvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID42429068
PMCPMC13354913

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.