ArticleInternational journal of social determinants of health and health services2026
Power, Politics, and Policy in the Making of Health Inequities: An Empirical Study of Equity-Oriented Policy Actors in Canada.
Article in International journal of social determinants of health and health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural health inequities in Canada remain entrenched-and in some areas have intensified-despite decades of commitments to equity. This study examines how power relations shape the conditions under which health equity policy reform is pursued and constrained. Grounded in critical political economy, the analysis draws on 23 semi-structured interviews with Canadian policy scholars, advocates, union leaders, and health professionals engaged in equity-oriented work. Thematic analysis identified four interrelated dynamics shaping health equity policymaking: institutional arrangements that privilege capital accumulation over redistribution; the institutionalization of corporate power within policymaking; neoliberal governance norms that narrow politically feasible policy responses; and fragmentation within civil society that weakens sustained collective pressure for redistributive change. Together, these dynamics illuminate how power is organized across economic, political, and institutional domains, contributing to persistent health inequities despite formal equity commitments. While participants referenced participation, consultation, and access to decision making, these mechanisms were experienced within policy environments characterized by structural power asymmetries. Rather than attributing inequities to evidence gaps or implementation failures, the analysis situates them as outcomes of political-economic arrangements shaping policy feasibility. Advancing health equity therefore requires confronting structural power relations and strengthening collective capacity for redistributive and democratic change beyond the health sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.