ArticleEndocrine2026
Association of rate-pressure product with diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: development and internal validation of a nomogram for diabetic retinopathy identification.
Article in Endocrine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the association and dose-response relationship between rate-pressure product (RPP) and prevalent diabetic retinopathy (DR), and to develop a nomogram for identifying DR in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
methodsA total of 1,316 hospitalized patients with T2DM, including 464 with DR, were retrospectively enrolled. LASSO regression was used for variable selection. Correlation analyses, multivariable logistic regression, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were performed to evaluate the association and dose-response relationship between RPP and prevalent DR. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the stability of the association. A nomogram was constructed and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, bootstrap validation, calibration assessment, Brier score, and decision curve analysis.
resultsAfter full adjustment for confounders, RPP was independently and positively associated with prevalent DR. Per 1-SD increase in RPP was associated with higher odds of DR (OR = 1.292, 95% CI: 1.136-1.469; P < 0.001). RCS analysis showed a significant overall association without evidence of nonlinearity (P for nonlinear > 0.05), and a positive dose-response trend was observed (P for trend < 0.001). The association remained consistent across most subgroups without significant interactions. The nomogram incorporating disease duration, using insulin, HbA1c, and RPP demonstrated acceptable discrimination (AUC = 0.732; bootstrap-corrected AUC = 0.727), good calibration, and favorable clinical utility.
conclusionsRPP is independently associated with prevalent DR in patients with T2DM. The RPP-based nomogram shows acceptable discrimination and calibration, suggesting clinical utility for DR identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42429883What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.