ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Cancer Education in the Era of Immediate Results Access.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immediate patient access to cancer-related results through digital portals has transformed the timing and nature of cancer communication. Although open records promote transparency, autonomy and engagement, they may expose patients to complex terminology before clinical interpretation is available. This creates a gap between information access and meaningful understanding, particularly when radiology, pathology or genomic reports contain terms such as "possible malignancy", "suspicious", "progression" or "cannot exclude". This article argues for digital result literacy as an essential component of cancer education. Patients require calibrated support to interpret results safely, avoid panic or false reassurance, and understand who is responsible for next steps. Clinicians also need training to respond when patients have already formed interpretations before consultation. Educational safeguards should include anticipatory guidance, plain-language summaries, safety-netting, named responsibility, equitable non-digital communication routes and preparation for AI-assisted result explanations. Immediate access should therefore become informed access, not isolated access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42430072What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.