Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42430358›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2026

An m/z- and Intensity-Based HRMS Clustering Algorithm Targeted toward Single-Cell Metabolomics.

Dirk Wevers, Laura Koldenhof, Laura Castaneda, Anouschka van der Zeeuw, Hellen Fass, Thomas Hankemeier, Charlie Clark, Ahmed Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dirk WeversMetabolomics and Analytics Centre, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Wassenaarseweg 76, AL Leiden2333, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0001-3392-5603
Laura KoldenhofMetabolomics and Analytics Centre, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Wassenaarseweg 76, AL Leiden2333, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0007-9173-3128
Laura CastanedaMetabolomics and Analytics Centre, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Wassenaarseweg 76, AL Leiden2333, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6922-9423
Anouschka van der ZeeuwHogeschool Leiden, Zernikedreef 11, CK Leiden2333, The Netherlands.
Hellen FassMetabolomics and Analytics Centre, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Wassenaarseweg 76, AL Leiden2333, The Netherlands.
Thomas HankemeierMetabolomics and Analytics Centre, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Wassenaarseweg 76, AL Leiden2333, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7871-2073
Charlie ClarkMetabolomics and Analytics Centre, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Wassenaarseweg 76, AL Leiden2333, The Netherlands.
Ahmed AliMetabolomics and Analytics Centre, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Wassenaarseweg 76, AL Leiden2333, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2157-4399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell (SC) metabolomics holds great potential in the development of novel diagnostic tools and mechanistic insights into cell biology. Using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), the masses of a single cell's constituents can be determined with an accuracy high enough to derive their respective elemental compositions. Using a molecule's mass and its MS fragmentation pattern, in many cases a molecular structure can be assigned or looked up in databases. Due to the small measurement cell volume of an Orbitrap HRMS instrument, samples need to be scanned multiple times, which necessitates across-scan clustering per sample, and across-sample alignment of m/z values. However, existing HRMS data processing software is not designed to process SC HRMS data, as it typically requires liquid chromatography retention times or reference spectra for m/z clustering and alignment. Herein, a novel, robust SC HRMS m/z clustering and alignment algorithm is presented and compared with two commercially available and industry standard algorithms used by Sciex MarkerView and Thermo FreeStyle. Furthermore, output is compared with clustering results from DBSCAN and MaldiQuant binning. Our algorithm, Global Clustering unTargeted Analysis (GCTA), enforces a strict maximum on the cluster size, thereby reducing the chance of peak aggregation. Furthermore, by design, GCTA enables noise filtering based on intensity and number of peaks. Across-scan clustering and across-sample alignment were contrasted for accuracy in finding peaks identified by commercial software output and peaks with known m/z values corresponding to standards and HMDB and LipidMaps database hits. Comparisons are made based on data recorded for quality control samples containing standard mixes as well as SC HRMS data recorded for two different cell lines. This work shows that the presented algorithm is comparable in accuracy with respect to MarkerView and FreeStyle, reliably identifies compounds, is less prone to peak splitting than MaldiQuant binning while providing similar levels of error in clustering peaks, and successfully filters noise. Furthermore, it is shown to be competitive with DBSCAN, MaldiQuant binning and MarkerView when compared to theoretical m/z values based on database hits. GCTA encompasses both m/z clustering and reference-free alignment, which makes it pivotal to further development of untargeted SC HRMS metabolomics.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryMetabolomicsSingle-Cell AnalysisAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisClustering AlgorithmsHumansSoftwareaggregationHRMS data processingnoise filteringpeak splittingreference-free clustering and alignmentsingle-cell metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID42430358
PMCPMC13450477

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.