ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2026
An m/z- and Intensity-Based HRMS Clustering Algorithm Targeted toward Single-Cell Metabolomics.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell (SC) metabolomics holds great potential in the development of novel diagnostic tools and mechanistic insights into cell biology. Using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), the masses of a single cell's constituents can be determined with an accuracy high enough to derive their respective elemental compositions. Using a molecule's mass and its MS fragmentation pattern, in many cases a molecular structure can be assigned or looked up in databases. Due to the small measurement cell volume of an Orbitrap HRMS instrument, samples need to be scanned multiple times, which necessitates across-scan clustering per sample, and across-sample alignment of m/z values. However, existing HRMS data processing software is not designed to process SC HRMS data, as it typically requires liquid chromatography retention times or reference spectra for m/z clustering and alignment. Herein, a novel, robust SC HRMS m/z clustering and alignment algorithm is presented and compared with two commercially available and industry standard algorithms used by Sciex MarkerView and Thermo FreeStyle. Furthermore, output is compared with clustering results from DBSCAN and MaldiQuant binning. Our algorithm, Global Clustering unTargeted Analysis (GCTA), enforces a strict maximum on the cluster size, thereby reducing the chance of peak aggregation. Furthermore, by design, GCTA enables noise filtering based on intensity and number of peaks. Across-scan clustering and across-sample alignment were contrasted for accuracy in finding peaks identified by commercial software output and peaks with known m/z values corresponding to standards and HMDB and LipidMaps database hits. Comparisons are made based on data recorded for quality control samples containing standard mixes as well as SC HRMS data recorded for two different cell lines. This work shows that the presented algorithm is comparable in accuracy with respect to MarkerView and FreeStyle, reliably identifies compounds, is less prone to peak splitting than MaldiQuant binning while providing similar levels of error in clustering peaks, and successfully filters noise. Furthermore, it is shown to be competitive with DBSCAN, MaldiQuant binning and MarkerView when compared to theoretical m/z values based on database hits. GCTA encompasses both m/z clustering and reference-free alignment, which makes it pivotal to further development of untargeted SC HRMS metabolomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.