ArticlePloS one2026
Identification of a HOMA-IR cut-off point for cardiometabolic risk and modifiable risk factors in peruvian adolescents.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough HOMA-IR is widely used to assess insulin resistance, reported cut-off values vary substantially across population, particularly during adolescence. The aim of this study was to determine the distribution of HOMA-IR values. identify a HOMA-IR cut-off associated with metabolic syndrome (MS), and assess modifiable risk factors of IR in a longitudinal cohort of Peruvian adolescents.
methodsWe performed a secondary data analysis from a longitudinal adolescent's study. A sample of 371 adolescents (14.5 ± 0.1 years old) from low- medium socioeconomic status. ROC curve analysis was used to identify the specific cut-off point to classify IR using the sensitivity and specificity values in comparison with the MS. Multiple logistic regression analysis including diet, physical activity and body composition from adolescence, excess weight during infancy and family history of non-chronic disease was included to identify risk factors (FHCD) associated with IR.
resultsThe HOMA-IR was 3.29 (SD 1.71) with no differences by sex. We identified 3.9 for HOMA-IR as the cut-off point with sensitivity (72.4%) and specificity (75.4%) for predicting MS. IR was present in 28.6% (95% CI 24.2;33.4%); 84% had at least one cardiometabolic risk factor and low HDL and abdominal obesity were the most prevalent (62 and 35%, respectively). Adolescents with higher fat mass index (OR 16.03, 95% CI 6.79 to 37.86), and those physically inactive (OR 2.08 95% CI 1.06 to 4.07) were more likely to have IR. No association was found with diet, excess weight at infancy and FHCD.
conclusionsA cut-offs point of 3.9 for HOMA-IR allows to identify adolescents with high metabolic risk. Strategies to promote lower FMI and improve the physical activity levels could reduce the risk of IR in adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.