ArticleJCI insight2026
Effect of ligands and HIV latency-reversing agents on estrogen receptor α in CD4+ T cells.
Article in JCI insight, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy of postmenopausal estrogen replacement in SIV-infected female macaques on antiretroviral therapy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The estrogen receptor (ER) is hypothesized to directly influence HIV transcription and latency but is also critical for immune signaling. However, the mechanisms of action of the ER in immune cells in the context of HIV are limited, and relevant to HIV cure strategies, the influence of latency reversal agents (LRAs) on the ER pathway are unknown. We evaluated (a) the effect of estrogen (E2) on the nuclear translocation of ERα in CD4+ T cells; (b) the ability of Fulvestrant, a selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), and ARV-471, a potent, PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) selective ERα degrader to modulate ERα; and c) the effect of different classes of LRAs on ERα signaling. In contrast to what has been demonstrated in oncology, E2 did not induce ERα nuclear translocation in CD4+ T cells. Similarly, neither Fulvestrant nor ARV-471 induced degradation of ERα in CD4+ T cells. LRAs significantly downregulated ERα gene and protein expression in both PBMCs and CD4+ T cells. Collectively, our results suggest that estrogen influences on HIV transcription are not likely a consequence of canonical nuclear ERα mechanisms. The consequences of LRA downregulation of ERα, a protein important for immune signaling, warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.