Applications of Large Language Models in Ovarian Cancer Management: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) is a highly fatal gynecologic malignancy with complex management challenges and limited long-term survival for advanced stages. Large language models (LLMs)-including systems such as GPT-4, Claude, Google Gemini, and others-are emerging artificial intelligence (AI) tools capable of performing health care-related tasks such as diagnostic support, treatment planning, report generation, and patient communication. However, their applications in OC care have not yet been comprehensively assessed. Objective: This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the use, performance, and clinical impact of LLMs in OC management. We will examine how LLMs have been applied across various domains (eg, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment planning, and patient engagement), the metrics used to assess their performance (eg, accuracy, sensitivity, and area under the curve), and their strengths and limitations. Methods: This review will be conducted in accordance with PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols) guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy will be implemented across biomedical, technical, and Chinese-language databases (eg, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) from inception to December 31, 2025. Eligible studies include clinical evaluations, validation studies, and real-world implementation reports involving LLMs in OC care. Two independent reviewers will perform screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal using validated tools (eg, version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions, Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2, and Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool+AI). Outcomes of interest include model performance metrics, clinical process impacts, safety concerns, and usability. Meta-analyses will be conducted where feasible using random-effects models in R (meta, metafor, and mada packages), including bivariate models for sensitivity and specificity. Results: The review is currently in progress. The PROSPERO registration has been completed, and the literature search and selection process is underway. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment are expected to be completed by mid-2026. Final results will include pooled performance metrics (eg, accuracy, F1-score, and area under the curve), qualitative insights into clinical integration, and identification of limitations such as reporting bias or insufficient external validation. Conclusions: This systematic review will provide the first comprehensive synthesis of evidence on the application of LLMs in OC care. It will identify promising use cases, highlight safety and reporting challenges, and inform future research directions. The findings are expected to support evidence-based integration of LLMs into gynecologic oncology workflows while promoting transparency and methodological rigor in AI evaluation.