ArticleVaccine2026
COVID-19 vaccination among people with HIV in Uganda: lessons from a high-risk group with high vaccine uptake for the next pandemic.
Article in Vaccine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04066036 (Population Effectiveness of Dolutegravir Implementation in Sub-Saharan Africa), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Population Effectiveness of Dolutegravir Implementation in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine, vaccination rates vary across settings and populations, especially among people living with HIV (PLHIV). We assessed factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination among PLHIV in Mbarara, Uganda.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional, secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study consisting of PLHIV ≥18 years old on antiretroviral therapy (ART). We collected data on COVID-19 vaccine uptake and associated factors beginning in December 2021, 9 months after the vaccine became available in Uganda. Reasons for vaccine acceptance and hesitancy were analyzed descriptively, while factors associated with vaccine uptake were assessed using Poisson models with robust standard errors.
resultsWe analyzed data from 449 participants with a mean age of 46 years (SD 9) and ART duration of 10 years (SD 4). 42% were female, 96% were virally suppressed (<50 copies/mL), and 83% (95% CI = 75%-92%) reported vaccination for COVID-19. In unadjusted analyses, greater concern about COVID-19, obtaining COVID-19 information from health resources, longer ART duration in years, and continuous access to soap and water were positively and significantly correlated with vaccine uptake (p < 0.05). Among those unvaccinated (n = 77/449, 17%), fear of side effects (n = 32/77, 42%) and beliefs that vaccination increased infection risk (n = 12/77, 16%) were predominant reasons for vaccine hesitancy.
conclusionsWe found high rates of COVID-19 vaccination among PLHIV on ART in Uganda. Among those unvaccinated, lack of confidence in the safety of the vaccine was the primary barrier to uptake. Future vaccine campaigns should emphasize vaccine safety and efficacy and actively combat misinformation to promote uptake. REGISTRY NUMBER: Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04066036.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.