In one paragraphArticle in The EMBO journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
15 authors.
Véronique MarthiensBiology of Centrosomes and Genetic Instability team, Institut Curie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Unité Mixte de Recherche 144, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL Research University), Paris, France. veronique.marthiens@curie.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1360-0617 Lin JawishBiology of Centrosomes and Genetic Instability team, Institut Curie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Unité Mixte de Recherche 144, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL Research University), Paris, France.
Margaux MalosseBiology of Centrosomes and Genetic Instability team, Institut Curie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Unité Mixte de Recherche 144, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL Research University), Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7973-7544 Clara BastoBiology of Centrosomes and Genetic Instability team, Institut Curie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Unité Mixte de Recherche 144, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL Research University), Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5326-0315 Denis KrndijaCell Migration and Invasion team, Institut Curie, CNRS-UMR144, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Anne-Sophie MacéCell and Tissue Imaging Facility (PICT-IBiSA), Institut Curie, CNRS-UMR 144, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Elmar LaignaBiology of Centrosomes and Genetic Instability team, Institut Curie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Unité Mixte de Recherche 144, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL Research University), Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8192-3220 Antonia TerrizzanoBiology of Centrosomes and Genetic Instability team, Institut Curie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Unité Mixte de Recherche 144, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL Research University), Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1601-997X Olivier ZajacCell Migration and Invasion team, Institut Curie, CNRS-UMR144, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Elsa LogarinhoAging and Aneuploidy Laboratory, i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, IBMC - Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Catherine VillardInstitut Curie, CNRS-UMR 168, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, Paris, France.
Renata BastoBiology of Centrosomes and Genetic Instability team, Institut Curie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Unité Mixte de Recherche 144, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL Research University), Paris, France. renata.basto@curie.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5556-2770 Funding
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) ANR-11-LABX-0038 and ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 Labex Cell(n)scaleAgence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) ANR22-CE16-0008EC | Horizon Europe | Excellent Science | HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (ERC) 725907 ERC-2016-COGMEC | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) CEECIND/00654/2020 and PTDC/MED-OUT/2747/2020
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Research on mitosis has predominantly examined cell-autonomous mechanisms, yet its regulation and consequences within the broader physiological context remain largely unexplored. It remains, therefore, unknown whether and how spindle assembly and chromosome segregation are influenced by tissue properties. We have investigated this question in the mammalian embryonic brain, using high-resolution microscopy combined with pharmacological perturbations and minimal cell systems to break down the contribution of tissue environment to mitotic fidelity. We found that cell density imposes biomechanical constraints upon the apical radial glial (aRG) cell population during their highly proliferative period, which enhances spindle pole microtubule polymerization rates and potentiates chromosome mis-segregation. Mechanistically, we show that cortical tension relying on branched actin organization at the cell cortex conveys mechanical stress exerted by cell density. We identified the microtubule depolymerase MCAK/Kif2C as a critical effector downstream of cortical actin, linking actin dynamics to spindle pole activity. Altogether, our findings demonstrate that aRG are mechanosensitive during their expansion phase, and that excessive biomechanical stress, imposed by high cell density in developing tissues, can disrupt mitotic fidelity.
Indexed as
BrainEmbryonic Stem CellsMitosisActinsAnimalsChromosome SegregationKinesinsMiceMicrotubulesSpindle ApparatusStress, MechanicalActinsKinesins
Identifiers
PMID42432253
PMCPMC13482099
What Socratic holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390