ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Design and clinical evaluation of a virtual reality-based system for automated ocular deviation measurement.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate measurement of ocular deviation is essential for strabismus assessment and treatment monitoring. Conventional methods such as the prism alternating cover test require trained examiners and substantial patient cooperation, which may introduce inter-examiner variability and limit measurement standardization. We developed a virtual reality (VR)-based system for automated horizontal ocular deviation measurement. The system simulates a prism alternating cover test in a controlled VR environment to guide fixation and record eye movement videos under standardized visual conditions. Recorded videos are processed using a multi-stage pupil localization and tracking pipeline to maintain robust performance under partial occlusion and blinking, and extracted pupil trajectories are converted into quantitative estimates of horizontal ocular deviation. In a pilot clinical evaluation, the system achieved over 93% agreement with clinician diagnoses in identifying horizontal ocular deviation categories, with a mean angular error of 0.35 ± 1.09° relative to reference clinical assessments. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of a VR-based automated system for standardized horizontal ocular deviation measurement and support its potential value for objective strabismus-related assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42432319What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.