Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42432853›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science2026

Sex-specific placental adaptations associated with fetal growth restriction: a review.

Leticia T Casarotto, Alexa M Holtzapple, Helen N Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leticia T CasarottoDepartment of Physiology and Aging, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9514-387X
Alexa M HoltzappleDepartment of Physiology and Aging, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Helen N JonesDepartment of Physiology and Aging, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a major obstetric complication linked to placental insufficiency, increasing the risk of perinatal morbidity, mortality, and long-term health issues. The placenta is central to fetal development and maternal-fetal communication; its dysfunction leads to impaired fetal development. Numerous experimental FGR models exist, from rodents to large animals, but most studies, despite changes to some federal funding requirements, have historically overlooked the impact of fetal sex on placental development, function, and adaptation. Recent evidence indicates that male and female placentas employ distinct adaptive strategies in response to adverse intrauterine conditions, potentially contributing to observed sex differences in neonatal outcomes and adult disease risk. Male fetuses often prioritize growth, reducing resilience to environmental stress, while female fetuses exhibit more pronounced growth restriction but greater placental adaptability, such as altered expression of insulin-like growth factors, angiogenic regulators, and nutrient transporters. This review synthesizes data from human studies and animal models to highlight sex-specific placental adaptations to nutrient restriction, hypoxia, maternal hyperthermia, and other stressors. Understanding these differences is critical for both developing future interventions in humans and enhancing livestock productivity/neonatal survival in agriculture.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalFetal Growth RetardationPlacentaAnimalsFemaleHumansMalePregnancyfetal growth restrictionplacentasex specific

Identifiers

PMID42432853
PMCPMC13455976

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.