ReviewJournal of animal science2026
Sex-specific placental adaptations associated with fetal growth restriction: a review.
Review in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a major obstetric complication linked to placental insufficiency, increasing the risk of perinatal morbidity, mortality, and long-term health issues. The placenta is central to fetal development and maternal-fetal communication; its dysfunction leads to impaired fetal development. Numerous experimental FGR models exist, from rodents to large animals, but most studies, despite changes to some federal funding requirements, have historically overlooked the impact of fetal sex on placental development, function, and adaptation. Recent evidence indicates that male and female placentas employ distinct adaptive strategies in response to adverse intrauterine conditions, potentially contributing to observed sex differences in neonatal outcomes and adult disease risk. Male fetuses often prioritize growth, reducing resilience to environmental stress, while female fetuses exhibit more pronounced growth restriction but greater placental adaptability, such as altered expression of insulin-like growth factors, angiogenic regulators, and nutrient transporters. This review synthesizes data from human studies and animal models to highlight sex-specific placental adaptations to nutrient restriction, hypoxia, maternal hyperthermia, and other stressors. Understanding these differences is critical for both developing future interventions in humans and enhancing livestock productivity/neonatal survival in agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.