ArticleMedicine2026
Hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage: Development of a preoperative risk prediction model.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is one of the most lethal and disabling forms of acute cerebrovascular disease. Hematoma expansion is a critical predictor of early deterioration and poor prognosis in ICH patients, making accurate preoperative risk prediction essential for clinical decision-making. This study aims to develop a preoperative risk prediction model for hematoma expansion in ICH patients to provide robust decision support for clinicians. A total of 156 patients with spontaneous ICH admitted to our hospital between January 2022 and July 2024 were included. The cohort was randomly divided into a training set (104 cases, 66.67%) and a validation set (52 cases, 33.33%). Baseline data were recorded for all patients, including age, sex, body mass index, admission systolic and diastolic blood pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale score at admission, initial hematoma volume, hematoma density, hematoma morphology, mean arterial pressure at onset, history of diabetes, use of anticoagulants, use of antiplatelet agents, prothrombin time, ICH grading score, computed tomography angiography spot sign score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to preliminarily identify potential risk factors for hematoma expansion. Significant variables were further analyzed using multivariate logistic regression to determine independent predictors. A dynamic risk prediction model based on DynNom was constructed. The model was validated internally using the Bootstrap method to evaluate its calibration and discrimination. Diagnostic thresholds and predictive performance were assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. The final model included initial hematoma volume, hematoma density, prothrombin time, and computed tomography angiography spot sign score as independent predictors. The nomogram model demonstrated good concordance between predicted and observed outcomes, with a concordance index of 0.798 (95% confidence interval: 0.771-0.825) and an area under the curve of 0.798 in the internal validation (split-sample) cohort. These metrics have been updated to match those reported in the main results section, ensuring consistency across the manuscript and accurately reflecting model performance in the selected dataset. This preoperative risk prediction model showed strong performance for early detection of hematoma expansion in ICH patients, with great potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.