ArticleMedicine2026
Association between relative fat mass and cognitive impairment in older adults: A cross-sectional study using NHANES 2011-2014 data.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relative fat mass (RFM), derived from height and waist circumference, may better reflect overall and central adiposity than body mass index. This study examined the association between RFM and cognitive impairment among older adults in the United States. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2014 data, including 2730 participants aged ≥ 60 years with valid anthropometric data, cognitive assessment data, and covariate information required for the primary analysis. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer Disease (word learning & delayed recall tests), animal fluency, and digit symbol substitution tests. Cognitive impairment was defined as performance below the education-specific 25th percentile of a standardized global cognition z-score. Weighted logistic regression models estimated associations between RFM and cognitive impairment, adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, and clinical factors. Nonlinearity was tested using restricted cubic spline and two-piecewise regression analyses. In the base-adjusted model, RFM was not significantly associated with cognitive impairment. After full adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, dietary, and clinical factors, higher RFM was associated with increased odds of cognitive impairment (odds ratio = 1.05; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.09). Sensitivity analyses excluding participants with very high body mass index, trimming RFM outliers, modeling log-transformed RFM, and using waist circumference as an alternative adiposity measure yielded directionally consistent results. The relationship was linear (P_overall = .042; P_nonlinear = .253), with stronger associations in participants aged < 70 years, and those with hypertension or prior stroke. Hypertension (10%) and physical inactivity (9.4%) partially mediated this relationship, whereas depression and diabetes showed minimal effects. Higher RFM was associated with greater odds of test-based cognitive impairment among United States older adults after multivariable adjustment. The observed associations involving hypertension and physical activity status were exploratory and should not be interpreted as causal. Future longitudinal studies are needed to clarify temporality and evaluate the potential clinical utility of RFM in cognitive risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.