Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433037›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical entomology2026

Hydrometeorological drivers of mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) abundance in an urbanized region of central Oklahoma.

Eric R Bump, Michael C Wimberly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael C WimberlyDepartment of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, Sarkeys Energy Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1549-3891

Funding

University of Oklahoma Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban mosquito abundance reflects not only temperature and rainfall but also other aspects of the local environment. We quantified species-specific responses to hydrometeorology in Norman, Oklahoma, using two seasons (2023-2024) of weekly data collected with CO2-baited BG-Sentinel traps at four sites. Daily meteorological observations were obtained from the Oklahoma Mesonet. The most abundant species were Aedes albopictus (Skuse), Aedes trivittatus (Coquillett), and the Culex pipiens Linnaeus/Culex quinquefasciatus Say complex. We modeled environmental relationships using negative binomial generalized additive models that incorporated linear distributed lags (0-56 days) and selected parsimonious combinations of predictors based on AICc. Ae. albopictus abundance was associated with shallow soil moisture (5 cm fractional water index) and drought (Standardized Precipitation-Evapotranspiration Index); abundance increased with drier conditions at short lags and with wetter conditions at longer lags. Ae. trivittatus was associated with mean temperature, shallow soil moisture, and solar radiation. Abundance increased with drier soils at short lags and with warm, sunny conditions and higher soil moisture at longer lags. Cx. pipiens/quinquefasciatus abundance increased with maximum temperature and exhibited a similar relationship with vapor pressure deficit. These results demonstrate that soil moisture, drought indices, and solar radiation capture hydrologic and atmospheric constraints that are often overlooked. Incorporating hydrometeorological variables can improve ecological interpretation and provide actionable indicators for timing urban mosquito control in the southern Great Plains.

Indexed as

AedesCulexCulicidaeAnimalsOklahomaPopulation DensitySeasonsdistributed lag modelsdrought indexpublic health entomologysoil moisturesolar radiationvector ecology

Identifiers

PMID42433037
PMCPMC13354607

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.