Evidence mapPaperPMID 42433253Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2026

Prediction of peak oxygen uptake using interpretable machine learning on routinely available preoperative assessments before lung resection.

Se-Hun Kim, Sa-Eun Park, Cho Hui Hong, Tae-Sung Park, Myung-Jun Shin, Ki-Hun Kim, Sang-Hun Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Se-Hun KimDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Sa-Eun ParkDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Cho Hui HongBiomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Sung ParkBiomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Myung-Jun ShinBiomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Ki-Hun KimDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Hun KimBiomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the reference standard for preoperative functional assessment before lung resection, but its use is limited by resource and practical constraints. This study developed and internally evaluated an interpretable machine learning model to estimate preoperative peak oxygen uptake (VO Methods: This single-centre retrospective study included 320 consecutive patients in South Korea who underwent preoperative treadmill CPET between April 2018 and March 2024. Thirty-three routinely available predictors-including demographic characteristics, anthropometric measures, pulmonary function results, and bioimpedance-derived indices-were used to train predictive models. Model development employed 10 repeats of 5-fold nested cross-validation. The best-performing model was interpreted using Shapley additive explanations. Potential prioritisation performance was assessed by classifying patients with VO Results: Random forest showed the best performance, with a root mean square error of 3.750±0.731, a mean absolute error of 2.901±0.599, and a coefficient of determination of 0.323±0.153, indicating moderate explanatory performance for VO Conclusions: This predictive model showed moderate performance for estimating VO

Indexed as

bioelectrical impedance analysisinterpretable machine learning (IML)peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak)preoperative risk assessmentThoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID42433253
PMCPMC13351959

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.