Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433401›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between low socioeconomic status and all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes.

Joanna Konkol, Chunrong Pang, Cheng Pu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joanna KonkolChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Chunrong PangChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine School of Basic Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Cheng PuDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and all-cause mortality among individuals with diabetes. We also examined how individual SES components, including income, employment, education, and housing conditions, were associated with mortality risk. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through September 2025. Eligible studies included adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes reporting associations between SES indicators (income, education, occupation, or area-level deprivation) and all-cause mortality. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity (I Results: Nineteen studies were included. Low SES was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (OR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.49-1.88; Conclusion: Low socioeconomic status is associated with increased mortality among individuals with diabetes. Addressing socioeconomic inequalities through improved access to education, employment opportunities, healthy environments, and equitable healthcare may help reduce survival disparities and mitigate the overall burden of diabetes. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=1248984, identifier PROSPERO (CRD420251248984).

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusMortalitySocial ClassCause of DeathHumansLow Socioeconomic StatusSocioeconomic Disparities in Healthall-cause mortalitydiabetes mellitushealth inequalitiesmeta-analysissocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID42433401
PMCPMC13350021

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.