ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Identifying early-life, environmental, and social stressors as key predictors of U.S. respiratory failure mortality: a machine learning study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traditional risk factors like smoking and air pollution remain insufficient to explain the persistent geographical variation in respiratory failure mortality across the United States, with significantly higher mortality observed in specific regions such as the Mississippi River Basin. Methods: We conducted a state-level ecological study using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) mortality data and 68 socio-environmental risk factors from Global Burden of Disease (GBD). Predictive modeling leveraged 12 machine learning algorithms (from linear to tree-based ensembles) with Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) interpretation. Results: The optimal model Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) achieved high accuracy (Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) = 0.7447, R-squared (R Conclusion: These findings suggest an "early-life and cumulative exposure" framework as a hypothesis-generating model. This framework identifies early-life vulnerability, environmental factors, and social stress as key state-level predictors that warrant further investigation. Our findings suggest a potential shift in research focus, moving from a reactive focus on adult-life risk factors toward proactive interventions targeting early-life vulnerabilities and cumulative environmental and social exposures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.