ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Organization of affordance processing in perception-action systems.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Visual tool processing (VTP), functional grasp planning (FGP) and tool use pantomimes (TUP) are typically associated with left-lateralized cerebral mechanisms. Yet, specific relationships between their neural underpinnings and levels of processing involved are largely unknown. We studied whether similar cerebral asymmetries are observed in the three tasks across different handedness groups, and how they link to the three-action system (3AS) model. Methods: Sixty-two participants (34 non-righthanders) were scanned with fMRI. The same stimuli-12 tools and 12 control objects-were utilized in each task. Whole-brain voxel wise analyses were performed and laterality indices (LIs) calculated in critical regions of interest (ROIs) for the assessment of hemispheric dominance, links to handedness, and global between-task relationships. Results: Depending on the region, VTP was not left lateralized, unlike FGP and TUP. The contributions of the dorso-dorsal, ventro-dorsal, and ventral stream-in 3AS associated with affordance processing, mechanical, and function knowledge-were contingent on task and phenotypic complexity. LIs for VTP and TUP, and FGP and TUP were significantly correlated. VTP and FGP LIs, unlike the TUP LIs, were linked to handedness. The global between-task relationships were contingent on processing levels. Discussion: These findings shed new light on affordance encoding, and their ability to automatically invoke neurocognitive mechanisms underlying tool functions and related actions. Future models should consider the mechanisms shared, the levels of processing involved, and their contingence on task complexity, individual variability, and sensorimotor integration, regardless of the involvement of manual responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.