ArticleBrain communications2026
Brain age gap as a diffusion MRI-based marker of traumatic brain injury-related brain changes and associated outcomes.
Article in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury is a common neurological disorder and a leading cause of long-term disability, presenting with heterogeneous cognitive, emotional, and functional impairments. A critical clinical challenge is the early identification of patients at risk for persistent symptoms. The Brain Age Gap (BAG), the difference between an individual's predicted brain age from imaging data and their chronological age, has emerged as a potential marker of injury-related brain changes. Here, we aim to evaluate diffusion-MRI-derived BAG for identifying traumatic brain injury patients (Glasgow Coma Scale 13-15) at risk for persistent symptoms. For this, we trained a normative age-prediction model on >13 000 healthy controls, and applied it to traumatic brain injury patients. We associated BAG clinical scores that evaluate processing speed and executive function (Trail Making Test Parts A and B), verbal memory (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test), general processing speed (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale), post-concussion symptoms (Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire), psychological distress (Brief Symptom Inventory-18) and insomnia severity (Insomnia Severity Index). Analyses included: (i) cross-sectional comparisons across three BAG-based subgroups: BAG+, BAGn and BAG-, representing patients with higher, neutral and lower BAGs relative to healthy controls, (ii) longitudinal linear mixed-effects models evaluating BAG measured at 2-week post-injury (BAG
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.