Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433515›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

Comparing deep-learning, radiomics, and fusion models for parathyroid tumor classification using ultrasound: a multicenter retrospective study.

Chun-Rui Liu, Peng-Xu Wen, Fen Chen, Bao-Jie Wen, Shu-Ping Wei, Yi-Dan Zhang, Hai-Yan Xue, Jin-Xia Gong, Li Huang, Zheng-Yang Zhou and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Chun-Rui Liu *Department of Ultrasound, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7376-7390
Peng-Xu Wen *School of Mathematics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Fen ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Bao-Jie WenDepartment of Ultrasound, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Shu-Ping WeiDepartment of Ultrasound, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yi-Dan ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Hai-Yan XueDepartment of Ultrasound, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Jin-Xia GongDepartment of Ultrasound, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Li HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Zheng-Yang ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Jian HeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Zi-Wei NieSchool of Mathematics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Jing YaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate preoperative differentiation between parathyroid adenoma (PA) and parathyroid carcinoma (PC) or atypical parathyroid tumor (APT) is critical for surgical planning, yet ultrasound accuracy remains highly operator-dependent. Leveraging the complementary advantages of radiomics and deep learning (DL), this study aimed to develop and compare radiomics, DL, and fusion models based on ultrasound imaging for the identification of APT/PC. Methods: A total of 1,122 patients (270 men and 852 women; mean age 54.2±13.7 years) with parathyroid neoplasms were retrospectively reviewed from two Chinese hospitals between January 1, 2016, and April 30, 2025. To address the limited number of APT/PC cases (n=74), multicenter data were pooled and stratified by pathological type into training (733 PA and 53 APT/PC), validation (158 PA and 10 APT/PC), and test sets (57 PA and 11 APT/PC). Radiomic features were extracted from preprocessed ultrasound images. DL features came from 1ch_ResNet101 (raw images) and 2ch_ResNet101 (concatenated region of interest images). Two fusion models were built: Merged model 1 (radiomics + 1ch_ResNet101) and Merged model 2 (radiomics + 2ch_ResNet101). Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in age at diagnosis between the training and validation sets, as well as between the validation and test sets (both P<0.001). Additionally, serum phosphate levels differed significantly between the training and test sets (P=0.022). On the test set, the top-performing models were Merged model 2 [area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) =0.933] and Merged model 1 (AUC =0.926), both of which surpassed the ResNet101 (P<0.001) and showed comparable performance to radiomics (AUC =0.905; P=0.171 and 0.059, respectively). 2ch_ResNet101 significantly outperformed 1ch_ResNet101 (AUC =0.873 Conclusions: All models enable timely identification of potentially malignant parathyroid tumors, with the fusion model outperforming DL and matching radiomics in diagnostic performance.

Indexed as

deep learning (DL)diagnosisParathyroid neoplasmsradiomicsultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID42433515
PMCPMC13350005

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.