ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Spatial-temporal and physical constrained deep learning model for simultaneous T1 and T2 reconstruction and mapping (STEP).
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Magnetic resonance (MR) parametric maps provide quantitative tissue characteristics that are valuable for medical diagnosis. However, existing T1 and T2 measurement techniques confront challenges such as prolonged reconstruction/fitting times and the requirement for multi-sequence image registration, limiting the clinical applicability of quantitative parameter mapping. The development of compressed sensing combined with parallel imaging technology has improved reconstruction efficiency. However, traditional two-step workflow lacks spatial constraints for parameter mapping and suffers from slow pixel-level fitting. Furthermore, deep learning methods are applied to reconstruction to accelerate reconstruction and remove noise but exhibit heavy dependence on training datasets and neglect to incorporate inherent low-rank and sparse data constraints. To address these challenges, this study proposes the spatial-temporal and physical constrained deep learning model for simultaneous T1 and T2 reconstruction and mapping (STEP) method. Methods: The method utilizes physical models for backpropagation of deep learning features, allowing physical priors to explicitly express the spatiotemporal correlations of images. This integration enables mutual enhancement between low-rank/sparse constraints and deep learning priors, thereby improving both constraint-based reconstruction and deep learning performances. Results: Experimental results from simulated brain data, real phantoms, and healthy volunteers demonstrate that the proposed method produces more accurate T1 and T2 maps than those obtained using conjugate gradient (CG), low-rank plus sparse (LS) matrix factorization least squares fitting, or conventional deep learning-based mapping methods. The method uses only 2-4% (spokes of 1,000 to 2,000) of full k-space data to simultaneously generate quantitative T1 and T2 maps, yet still achieves a structural similarity (SSIM) greater than 0.7 and a normalized root mean square error (nRMSE) lower than 0.1. The proposed method also yielded excellent Pearson correlation coefficients of R Conclusions: The proposed method extracts feature information through low-rank sparse priors and optimizes backpropagation via physical models, integrating the synergistic advantages of deep learning and low-rank sparse iterative processing to achieve concurrent T1 and T2 quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.