ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Non-invasive diagnostic model for myocarditis using cardiac magnetic resonance radiomics.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myocarditis is an inflammatory myocardial disease with high clinical heterogeneity, and its early diagnosis relies on invasive endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) or advanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) techniques with poor accessibility in primary hospitals. Conventional CMR interpretation is subjective with inter-observer variability, and single-modality radiomics models have insufficient diagnostic accuracy. This study aimed to construct and validate a machine learning model integrating multimodal CMR radiomics features and clinical parameters for early non-invasive and accurate diagnosis of myocarditis. Methods: This study recruited 344 participants from two hospitals (185 with myocarditis and 159 without myocarditis). Radiomics features were extracted from the left ventricular myocardium using multimodal CMR sequences [cine sequence (CINE), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and late gadolinium enhancement imaging (LGE)] and combined with clinical parameters. Feature selection was performed sequentially: first, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis was used to retain features with ICC >0.8 for reproducibility; then, Mann-Whitney Results: The Fusion_Clinical_Radiomic model exhibited optimal and stable diagnostic performance, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.936 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.905-0.967], 0.862 (95% CI: 0.779-0.944), and 0.854 (95% CI: 0.754-0.953) in the training set, internal validation set, and external validation set, respectively. Its accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity in the training set were 0.848, 0.845, and 0.850, respectively, with a favorable Brier score of 0.141. In the external validation set, it maintained a specificity of 0.906 and a Brier score of 0.193. The model's performance was significantly superior to all unimodal models and the radiomics fusion model alone (all P<0.05). Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the model had extensive clinical net benefits. Conclusions: The fusion model provides an accurate, non-invasive auxiliary diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis within 14 days of symptom onset. By relying on conventional CMR sequences (CINE, T2WI, LGE), it may reduce the reliance on invasive EMB and enhance diagnostic accessibility in primary hospitals. Supported by multicenter internal and external validation, the model exhibits favorable generalizability, offering a promising reference for clinical practice in the early identification of acute myocarditis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.