ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Exploring the landscape of artificial intelligence in dental and maxillofacial radiology: a bibliometric analysis of studies and trends.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental and maxillofacial radiology is revolutionizing diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making. This bibliometric analysis investigates the research landscape, emerging trends, and scholarly impact of AI applications in this specialized field. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on 25 December 2024 using the Web of Science Core Collection database. Data analysis tools, including VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and Biblioshiny, were employed to examine publication trends, global contributions, collaborative networks, and keyword dynamics. Results: The analysis revealed a marked increase in AI-related publications in dental and maxillofacial radiology, particularly from 2016 onward. The number of studies rose steadily, reaching 218 publications in 2024. The United States led in research output, followed closely by China and South Korea, with KU Leuven emerging as the top-contributing institution. Reinhilde Jacobs was identified as the most prolific author, while Medical Physics was the most cited journal. Co-citation analysis highlighted influential works by authors such as J.H. Lee and F. Schwendicke . Keywords including "artificial intelligence," "deep learning," "CBCT," and "classification" dominated research discussions, reflecting the field's evolving focus. Recent research trends emphasize advanced applications in segmentation, accuracy enhancement, and predictive modeling. Conclusion: AI has become integral to the advancement of dental and maxillofacial radiology, offering significant improvements in diagnostic precision and treatment planning. This study underscores the importance of staying abreast of AI innovations to enhance patient care and foster future research opportunities. Researchers and clinicians are encouraged to adopt AI-driven approaches to maximize clinical efficiency and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.