ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Efficacy and safety of obicetrapib in patients at high cardiovascular risk: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dyslipidemia, particularly elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), is a major risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Despite statin therapy, many patients fail to achieve target lipid levels or experience intolerance. Obicetrapib, a next-generation cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor, has demonstrated potent lipid-modifying effects and favorable pharmacokinetics compared to its predecessors. Objectives: To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of obicetrapib in patients with dyslipidemia at high cardiovascular risk. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted through June 2025. Eligible RCTs compared obicetrapib 10 mg once daily with placebo, reporting participants who were adults with dyslipidemia at high cardiovascular risk, defined as having established ASCVD, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus with additional risk factors, or persistently elevated LDL-C despite maximally tolerated statin therapy. Data were pooled using random-effects models to calculate mean differences (MDs) for lipid parameters and risk ratios (RRs) for safety outcomes. Heterogeneity was explored via sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Results: Three RCTs ( Conclusion: Obicetrapib produces substantial, consistent improvements in atherogenic and anti-atherogenic lipid fractions without increasing adverse events. It holds promise as an adjunctive therapy for high-risk patients with residual dyslipidemia despite optimal statin therapy, pending confirmation from cardiovascular outcome trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.