Evidence mapPaperPMID 42433975Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026

Superficial heat therapy in women's health.

Antti Puhakka, Sylvia Mechsner, Katarzyna Placek, José Lourenço Reis, Gabriele Saccone, Angelo Cagnacci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Antti PuhakkaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Sylvia MechsnerEndometriosis Centre Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Katarzyna PlacekClinical Department of Obstetrics, Women's Diseases and Oncological Gynecology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
José Lourenço ReisDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Da Luz Torres De Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Gabriele SacconeDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Angelo CagnacciHead of the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, San Martino Hospital, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Female-specific pain conditions such as dysmenorrhoea, endometriosis, and pain associated with pregnancy, childbirth, and menopause are highly prevalent and frequently impair quality of life. Superficial heat therapy (SHT) has long been used for pain relief and is well established in the management of musculoskeletal pain through mechanisms including vasodilation, improved microcirculation, muscle relaxation, and modulation of peripheral and central nociceptive pathways. This narrative review aims to synthesize current scientific evidence and clinical experience regarding the role of SHT in managing pain across multiple stages of women's health. Methods: A targeted literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus for studies published between 2010 and 2026, supplemented by earlier relevant publications. Search terms included "superficial heat therapy," "thermotherapy," "heat wrap," "dysmenorrhoea," "endometriosis," "labor pain," "postpartum pain," "breastfeeding-related musculoskeletal pain," and "menopause-related musculoskeletal pain." Evidence was evaluated and integrated with the authors' clinical experience. Results: Evidence suggests that SHT may provide clinically meaningful pain relief in several female-specific conditions. In dysmenorrhoea and endometriosis-related pelvic pain, SHT has shown analgesic efficacy comparable in some studies to commonly used analgesics. During labor, thermal interventions such as warm compresses are associated with reduced pain perception and improved maternal comfort. In postpartum and breastfeeding contexts, SHT may alleviate lumbopelvic and musculoskeletal pain related to biomechanical stress and prolonged postures. In peri- and postmenopausal women, SHT can reduce musculoskeletal discomfort and improve functional outcomes. Wearable heat patches represent a practical option due to their sustained, controlled heat delivery and compatibility with daily activities. Conclusion: SHT represents a safe, non-invasive, and accessible adjunctive modality for the management of abdominal and MSK pain across different stages of women's lives. Although it should not replace standard pharmacological or surgical treatments, it may complement conventional therapies and support patient self-management strategies. The integration of SHT into routine clinical care may enhance patient self-management, reduce reliance on pharmacological therapies, and improve quality of life across different stages of women's health. Future well-designed clinical studies are needed to standardize treatment protocols, establish optimal application parameters, and further clarify its role in conditions where current evidence remains limited or largely extrapolated.

Indexed as

breastfeedingdysmenorrhoeaendometriosislabor painmenopauseMSK painsuperficial heat therapyWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID42433975
PMCPMC13350454

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.