ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
The health benefits of alkaline water: is it a fact or marketing myth?
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alkaline water has gained widespread popularity and is frequently marketed for benefits related to hydration, acid-base balance, metabolic health, and immune function. These claims are increasingly encountered in primary care, yet their clinical validity remains uncertain. Objective: To critically evaluate current evidence on alkaline water, focusing on its physiological effects, clinical relevance, and safety in routine patient care. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted, including human clinical studies, experimental interventions, and animal models. Outcomes examined included gastrointestinal health, hydration status, bone metabolism, metabolic parameters, oxidative stress, and immune function. Results: Evidence suggests that alkaline water provides limited, context-specific benefits. The most consistent findings relate to gastrointestinal effects, particularly pepsin inactivation and potential improvement in reflux-related symptoms. Modest effects on hydration markers, urinary pH, and selected indicators of bone resorption have been reported, especially with bicarbonate-rich formulations. In contrast, evidence supporting metabolic, antioxidant, and immunological benefits is inconsistent and largely derived from small or preclinical studies. Claims of systemic alkalinization, enhanced immunity, anti-aging, and disease prevention are not supported by robust clinical evidence. Clinical implications: Alkaline water should not be routinely recommended in primary care. Clinicians should emphasize evidence-based interventions and exercise caution in vulnerable populations, including individuals with chronic kidney disease, those on acid-suppressive therapy, pregnant women, and children. Conclusion: Alkaline water has limited clinical utility. Its effects are modest and likely driven more by mineral composition than pH alone. Further well-designed, long-term studies are required before definitive recommendations can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.