ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Artificial intelligence in membranous nephropathy: transforming clinical management toward precision medicine.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Membranous Nephropathy (MN) is the leading cause of primary nephrotic syndrome in adults, characterized by significant clinical heterogeneity ranging from spontaneous remission to end-stage kidney disease. Current management of membranous nephropathy, which relies heavily on renal biopsy and static serological markers such as anti-PLA2R antibodies, often fails to predict individual disease trajectories. This limitation frequently leads to empirical immunosuppressive therapy with a trial-and-error approach. This review explores the transformative potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in reshaping MN management from evidence-based to data-driven and predictive medicine. We examine AI-driven innovations across the clinical spectrum: from computational pathology systems that automate glomerular morphometry with high objectivity and reproducibility, to non-invasive diagnostic models integrating radiomics and serology for non-invasive diagnosis. In therapeutics, we discuss machine learning algorithms that predict individual responses to Rituximab versus Cyclophosphamide, enabling personalized regimen selection. Furthermore, we highlight the role of AI in prognostic stratification, where dynamic in silico patient models and multi-omics integration unravel molecular subtypes and forecast renal survival with high granularity. While acknowledging critical challenges such as data silos, model interpretability gaps, and the need for global validation, we conclude that AI serves as a powerful augmentation tool. By synthesizing high-dimensional data into actionable insights, AI has the potential to facilitate increasingly predictive, preventative, and personalized care strategies in MN management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.