ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Anatomy-guided context-aware deep learning for lumbar degenerative disease grading and burden-aware risk assessment on MRI.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated lumbar spine MRI analysis has made notable progress in recent years, yet existing methods still suffer from anatomical ambiguity, insufficient use of explicit structural priors, and limited modeling of inter-level degenerative dependency, which restrict their reliability for clinically meaningful burden assessment. To address these limitations, we propose an anatomy-guided, multi-sequence, multi-level deep learning framework for lumbar degenerative disease grading and patient-level risk assessment. First, an anatomical parsing module is pre-trained to segment vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs, and the spinal canal, providing stable level localization and structural priors for downstream analysis. Then, the localized multi-sequence MRI patches and quantitative anatomical biomarkers are jointly encoded and further modeled by a lightweight Transformer to capture contextual dependency across lumbar levels, enabling both segment-level ordinal grading and Clinically Significant Degeneration Score (CSDS)-based patient-level burden assessment. Extensive experiments on public datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves superior performance over representative baselines, reaching a Macro F1-score of 0.783 ± 0.010, a Cohen's Kappa of 0.765 ± 0.012, a weighted log loss of 0.463 ± 0.018, and a patient-level AUC of 0.891 ± 0.009, while supplementary evaluations further verify the robustness of the anatomical parsing stage. The ablation results show that anatomy-guided cropping, quantitative biomarker fusion, spine-context modeling, and consistency regularization each contribute complementary gains, confirming that the effectiveness of the framework arises from their coordinated interaction rather than from any single component alone. Overall, these findings indicate that explicitly integrating anatomical priors, structured biomarkers, and multilevel context can substantially improve both diagnostic accuracy and interpretability, while also supporting more standardized, transparent, and human-centered lumbar MRI assessment in radiological practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.