ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2026
Exploring the potential factors of burning mouth syndrome in elderly people: A cross-sectional study.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS) remains a clinical challenge because of the unclear and multifactorial nature of its etiopathogenesis. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the prevalence and potential factors involved in the occurrence of BMS in older adults. Materials and Methods: Data from 365 individuals attending healthcare services in Manaus, Brazil, were analyzed. Clinical evaluation was conducted by a single calibrated examiner. Sociodemographic aspects, health conditions, medication use, smoking habits, need for dental prostheses, presence of xerostomia, and reports of BMS were also evaluated. The chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, G-test, binary logistic regression, and odds ratios were used to estimate the occurrence of BMS based on the independent variables. Results: The prevalence rate of BMS was 4.9%. In univariate analyses, BMS was significantly associated with race (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.013), systemic arterial hypertension (p = 0.024), and xerostomia (p = 0.005). In the binary logistic regression model, BMS was significantly associated with race (p = 0.031), with white participants having a 7.3 times higher risk of BMS than multiracial participants (OR = 7.3; 95% CI: 2.4-22.1). Binary logistic regression also showed that xerostomia was significantly associated with BMS (p = 0.019), increasing the risk by 3.8 times (OR = 3.8; 95% CI: 1.2-11.8). Conclusions: Race and xerostomia were associated with BMS in older adults. These findings may help clinicians refine and tailor treatment strategies within a personalized care approach for this population.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.