ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026
From severity scoring to predictive analytics: the emerging role of AI in neurosurgery.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into neurosurgical practice is transforming every phase of patient care from diagnostic imaging and preoperative planning to intraoperative decision-making and postoperative management. This narrative review traces the evolution of data-driven neurosurgery, beginning with traditional severity scoring systems and advancing toward predictive analytics and intelligent automation. By examining structured data (such as electronic health records and laboratory values) alongside complex unstructured inputs (including neuroimaging, surgical videos, and free-text notes), can extract clinically meaningful patterns, with reported performance metrics such as Dice scores of 0.82-0.84 for tumor segmentation and AUC values of 0.80-0.90 for molecular prediction and outcome forecasting. Applications in lesion detection, surgical navigation, prognostication, and rehabilitation are discussed, along with critical challenges in interpretability, data harmonization, bias mitigation, and regulatory approval. Emerging paradigms such as federated learning, generative AI, and continuous learning ecosystems are also explored as future pathways toward ethical, adaptive, and globally connected neurosurgical intelligence. As a narrative review, this work synthesizes key developments qualitatively; specific performance metrics and limitations regarding systematic selection, quantitative synthesis, and variable model validation are addressed. Ultimately, AI serves not as a replacement for the neurosurgeon but as a cognitive collaborator, augmenting precision, efficiency, and patient-centered outcomes in modern neurosurgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.