Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42434416›Full record

ArticleSleep medicine: X2026

Brief re-reading boosts sleep-related prose memory consolidation.

Serena Malloggi, Francesca Conte, Oreste De Rosa, Letizia Nikehasani, Andrea Farolfi, Stefania Righi, Mattia Varriale, Maria Pia Viggiano, Gianluca Ficca, Fiorenza Giganti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep medicine: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Serena MalloggiDepartment of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Via di San Salvi 12, Florence, 50135, Italy.
Francesca ConteDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania L.Vanvitelli, Viale Ellittico 31, Caserta, 81100, Italy.
Oreste De RosaDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania L.Vanvitelli, Viale Ellittico 31, Caserta, 81100, Italy.
Letizia NikehasaniDepartment of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Via di San Salvi 12, Florence, 50135, Italy.
Andrea FarolfiDepartment of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Via di San Salvi 12, Florence, 50135, Italy.
Stefania RighiDepartment of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Via di San Salvi 12, Florence, 50135, Italy.
Mattia VarrialeDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania L.Vanvitelli, Viale Ellittico 31, Caserta, 81100, Italy.
Maria Pia ViggianoDepartment of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Via di San Salvi 12, Florence, 50135, Italy.
Gianluca FiccaDepartment of Psychology, University of Campania L.Vanvitelli, Viale Ellittico 31, Caserta, 81100, Italy.
Fiorenza GigantiDepartment of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Via di San Salvi 12, Florence, 50135, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep plays a crucial role in memory consolidation. In everyday educational settings, students often rapidly review studied material just before sleep, but the effect of this strategy on subsequent memory has never been investigated. Here we assessed whether briefly re-reading a studied text immediately before a retention interval spent asleep or awake affects its delayed recall. In a mixed design, 34 university students were assigned to a Sleep or a Wake group. Eight hours after studying and immediately recalling a brief text, participants either quickly re-read it (for 1 min) or not, before an approximately 8-h retention interval spent asleep or awake. Main effects of Group and Condition were found (better performance in Sleep vs. Wake and in Re-reading vs. No Re-reading conditions, respectively), as well as an interaction Group x Condition. Crucially, only participants who re-read the text before sleeping showed a net improvement in recall relative to their own initial performance, whereas performance slightly deteriorated in all other conditions. These findings extend previous work on sleep-related prose memory consolidation by showing that a brief pre-sleep review, ecologically similar to common student study habits, can boost subsequent memory beyond mere protection from forgetting. They suggest that quick reviews of studied material at bedtime may represent an effective and practical strategy for memory enhancement in real-life learning contexts.

Indexed as

Learning strategiesMemory consolidationProse memorySleepSleep effect

Identifiers

PMID42434416
PMCPMC13351894

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.