ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
A spatiotemporal state-inference framework for adaptive immunotherapy in glioblastoma.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although immunotherapy has transformed outcomes in several solid tumors, it has yielded little survival benefit in glioblastoma (GBM). This limited efficacy may in part reflect not only modest drug activity and a chronically immunosuppressive microenvironment, but also a temporal mismatch between fixed treatment schedules and a tumor-immune ecosystem that evolves across space and time. This review outlines the GBM Immune-Spatiotemporal Feedback Loop (GBM-ISFL), a clinician-governed, hypothesis-generating framework that conceptualizes adaptive immunotherapy as a process of longitudinal sensing, biologic state inference, phase-matched intervention, and iterative feedback. Drawing on single-cell and spatial multi-omics, radiologic assessment, and liquid-biopsy studies, we outline a four-phase atlas of GBM evolution and define a patient-specific Critical Transition Window. This window may functionally overlap with the post-radiotherapy interval highlighted by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2.0, but it should not be treated as a fixed calendar block or as a validated clinical interval. To narrow the resulting observability gap, we position spatiotemporal graph neural networks (STGNNs) as candidate tools for noninvasive inference of latent tumor-immune states from serial multimodal data, including imaging dynamics, treatment exposure, and circulating biomarker trajectories. We further describe how uncertainty-aware state inference could support exploratory phase-specific therapeutic reasoning, translational validation, and lifecycle governance. By reframing GBM immunotherapy around biologic phase rather than chronology alone, the GBM-ISFL offers a testable route toward adaptive, state-informed, and clinically governed precision intervention, but it should not be interpreted as a current standard-of-care algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.