ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2026
Light therapy in medicine: where do we stand?
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Light therapy encompasses a broad spectrum of interventions, ranging from established clinical applications to emerging and experimental indications. This review evaluates the current state of light therapy across medical disciplines, emphasizing the need to distinguish validated clinical uses, exploratory findings, and preclinical research. The biological effects of light therapy are diverse, with mechanisms depending on wavelength, route of delivery, and biological target. Ocular exposure to bright light primarily acts through the circadian system to influence mood and sleep, whereas peripheral photobiomodulation (PBM) and ultraviolet (UV) phototherapy act directly on local tissues to promote healing. Mitochondrial activation is a proposed general mechanism, but its centrality is likely modality- and context-dependent. Robust clinical evidence supports bright light therapy for seasonal affective disorder (SAD) and UV-B for psoriasis, while moderate evidence exists for dermatological and sleep applications. For delirium, bright light therapy has shown promise in small-scale studies, but large-scale confirmatory clinical trials are still lacking. Other reported uses, including pain management, ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury, clotting disorders, and infectious lung injury, are largely supported by preclinical and mechanistic studies, particularly those involving intense light that elicits the circadian core protein Period 2 (PER2). The clinical relevance of these mechanisms remains under investigation. Overall, light therapy remains safe when used according to established protocols. This review aims to provide a nuanced synthesis of the field, highlighting both the promise and the limitations of light therapy and emphasizing the importance of the evidence hierarchy in guiding clinical translation and research priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.